For several weeks now, the clatter of Russian guns in Ukraine has brought up a very bad memory for Europe. That of war. European countries were prepared for it. Since 2014, when Crimea was annexed by Russia, Europe has once again become one of the hotspots of the global arms trade. In Africa, the acquisition of military equipment has clearly diminished – by 13% from 2015 to 2020. However, faced with numerous security threats – terrorism, transnational crime, piracy – the continent remains particularly affected.
This is part 3 of a 4-part series
The three men who land in Bangui on 22 March 2013 are full of hope. Employees of a large group specialising in the arms and security business have been approached by the entourage of François Bozizé, president of the Central African Republic (CAR). It is a time of suspicion and wild rumours in the capital city.
On 10 December 2012, a motley coalition of rebel groups from the north had launched an offensive with the aim of overthrowing Bozizé’s regime, before an agreement signed in Libreville, Gabon on January 11 halted their advance.
Since then, the rebels have been camped out in the town of Sibut, north of the capital; and they’re still a menace. The head of state thinks he can take advantage of the truce to strengthen his position. It is precisely for this purpose that our three men are in Bangui. The “shopping list” envisaged by Bozizé’s entourage says it all: combat helicopters, armoured vehicles, ammunition. “There were too many requests and the deadline was too short. In the end, no agreement was reached,” says one of the participants in the negotiations.
The day after their arrival, the trio are preparing to leave CAR when they are stopped at Bangui airport. All three men are accused of trying to deliver arms to the rebels and taken to the gendarmerie camp. That evening, the rebels attack Bangui in a lightning strike, forcing Bozizé to flee the country. The gendarmerie camp is deserted. The three men are finally able to leave the country.
The company that employs them is none other than Paramount, one of the continent’s leading arms dealers. It is based in South Africa and headed by Ivor Ichikowitz, a wealthy businessman who, at 56, is one of Africa’s most high-profile arms dealers.
We are not in the destruction business, but in the protection business.
Born in Gauteng province, South Africa, he comes from an Eastern European Jewish family. His grandfather, Charles, came to South Africa from Lithuania in the 1930s and settled there as a timber trader. Ivor’s father, Louis, made his fortune importing cars from Japan.
Very concerned about his image, Ivor Ichikowitz hates being classified as an arms dealer. He considers himself a philanthropist whose arms-selling business serves peace above all. “We are not in the destruction business, but in the protection business,” he likes to say. In addition to Paramount’s 15 global business units, the Ichikowitz Family Foundation funds projects, such as anti-poaching and reconstruction programs, in South Africa, Gabon and elsewhere. Ichikowitz has interests in mining, renewable energy and intermediary oil projects in various African countries.
The businessman only broke into South Africa’s military and aviation scene after the end of apartheid in 1994. This he did through his networks in the African National Congress (ANC), of which he was a financier. He is close to Winnie Mandela and to Moeletsi Mbeki, brother of former president Thabo Mbeki.
Gabon, a major source of support
Ichikowitz began establishing his connections with various leaders in the 1980s and 1990s, when he was one of the African representatives of Glencore, the Anglo-Swiss multinational commodity trading and mining company based in Baar, Switzerland. At the same time, Ichikowitz and one of his colleagues opened the luxurious Molori Safari Lodge in the Madikwe Game Reserve in South Africa.
The lodge hosted prestigious guests, such as former presidents Nelson Mandela and Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, as well as former Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Ichikowitz admitted contributing $405,600 to the election campaign of Jacob Zuma, South Africa’s president from 2009 to 2018, and during his tenure, Paramount established itself as a leading military and aviation company.
The businessman is also close to former Malawian President Joyce Banda. In 2013, Paramount’s naval subsidiary, Nautic Africa, signed an arms contract to supply patrol boats, among other things. Worth $145m, the deal was eventually cancelled by Banda’s successor, Peter Mutharika.
More recently, Ichikowitz has become a major supplier of military equipment, weapons, armoured vehicles and aircraft to the Mozambican government, which is facing a jihadist insurgency in its northern province of Cabo Delgado. Some Mozambican soldiers were even trained by Paramount contractors in South Africa. Ichikowitz sold Mozambique some old Gazelle helicopters, which had been demilitarised and resold by Britain and France after they refreshed their own inventory.
According to our information, Paramount has also been supplying the army of the DRC since last year. However, one of Paramount’s major sources of support in Francophone Africa is Gabon, whose president, Ali Bongo Ondimba, the South African businessman has known for almost 20 years.
The latter was minister of defence under his father, Omar, when Paramount delivered its first two Mirage F1s to Libreville in 2006. He became head of state three years later and continued to work with Ichikowitz, even visiting the group’s facilities in Johannesburg in 2010. New Mirage aircraft were purchased from Paramount, which also supplied 10 mine-resistant armoured vehicles in 2011.
In Gabon, Ichikowitz also got close to Maixent Accrombessi (Ali Bongo Ondimba’s former chief of staff) and Richard Attias (founder of Richard Attias & Associates). Both Ichikowitz and Bongo spoke at the New York Forum Africa, which was held in August 2015 in Libreville. A year earlier, the publicist and the businessman had attended the military parade organised for the national holiday.
To develop his activities in French-speaking Africa, Ivor Ichikowitz was able to rely on the networks of an old friend, Frenchman Jean-Yves Ollivier, a commodities trader adept at parallel diplomacy. A sign of their close relationship is Plot for Peace, a film recounting Ollivier’s life and which was produced in 2013 by the South African businessman’s foundation. The two men met during the years of struggle against apartheid.
Through Ollivier, Ichikowitz met Republic of Congo President Denis Sassou Nguesso, to whom, in 2010, he sold 1980s-era French Mirage jets that came from the South African Air Force’s stockpile. “Today, they are used mainly to decorate military parades on national holidays. The pilots and fuel are paid for by Paramount,” says a group executive.
In Gabon, as in Congo-Brazzaville, Ichikowitz has had difficulty ensuring payments. This is a constant in the arms industry, where relationships between buyers and suppliers can be strained.
In November 2015, Paramount signed a huge contract, worth $60m, with the Malian government. Some 40 armoured vehicles were to be delivered. The authorities in Bamako paid an advance. The remainder was to be paid in instalments, with each delivery. The problem was that years passed and the promised vehicles were slow to arrive in Mali. Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta (IBK) opened up about his problem to United Arab Emirates President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyane as well as South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa.
He’s a trader at heart. It’s in his blood. Ivor is always trying to find a new deal to make money. He’s not really bothered by the merchandise and the people involved, nor does he worry about who he might step on to make the best deal possible.
A dozen vehicles were finally delivered in 2019. Since then, nothing. In total, Mali has paid $30m, but has only received a quarter of the promised equipment. The instability in Bamako, where IBK was overthrown in August 2020, has not helped.
The problem is relatively similar in Togo. Introduced once again by Jean-Yves Ollivier, Ichikowitz sold armoured vehicles to the army there for the first time in 2016. A new contract was signed in 2019 for the same type of vehicles: Marauders, Mbombe 4s and Mavericks. Again, deliveries have been slow. Officially, Paramount says it is waiting for the Togolese authorities to respect the schedule negotiated when the contract was signed. Even so, other sources say the South African group has accepted delivery terms that it was not in a position to honour financially.
Name in the Panama Papers
These hitches have largely contributed to tarnishing Paramount’s reputation in the arms industry. Unhappy with management, several of its close associates left the group with a bang. In early 2018, Paramount Combat Systems – the only South African entity manufacturing armoured vehicles – was declared insolvent and went into receivership.
“He’s a trader at heart. It’s in his blood. Ivor is always trying to find a new deal to make money. He’s not really bothered by the merchandise and the people involved, nor does he worry about who he might step on to make the best deal possible,” one former employee tells us.
Another source, highly critical of the group’s financial management, explains that “Ichikowitz uses money from new contracts to cover the shortfalls of those he is already behind on”. This, he says, is the reason for the regular delivery delays.
In 2015, the businessman’s name appeared in the Panama Papers, a series of leaked documents created by (and taken from) Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, detailing the business information of more than 200,000 offshore entities.
Two years later, Barclays Bank, through which nearly $430m linked to Ichikowitz passed, warned the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen) of potential “suspicious” transactions. Among other things, the British bank was concerned about “the source of Ichikowitz’s wealth and his companies, and his possible involvement in the payment of bribes”. In its own defence, Paramount noted that if Barclays believed the transaction was suspicious, “they would have been within their rights to block it and their compliance team would have done so.”
Right of reply: Ivor ICHIKOWITZ
This article calls for the following observations from my part:
First of all, it is very disappointing that the journalist didn’t give me the opportunity to comment, or approached me or a company representative for an interview before the publication of this article. This would have avoided the publication of false information.
Secondly, in your article you grouped me together with two other individuals and described us as the three key figures in the opaque arms business”. This clearly demonstrate that there is a misunderstanding of who I am and what I do.
I am an industrialist and philanthropist with business interests across many sectors, including real estate, aviation, mining, energy, retail and tourism. The Paramount Group is one of many investments within my business portfolio.
The Paramount Group of Companies that I founded are active in the design and manufacture of defence, maritime/naval and aerospace technologies for sovereign governments around the world. These companies operate in no less that ten factories and innovation centres, employing hundreds of engineers, designers, technicians and mechanics who are at the forefront of developing some of the most advanced technologies in the global aerospace and defence sector.
I created these companies for the purpose of allowing legitimately elected governments to defend their countries, protect territorial sovereignty and maintain stability so that they can support and protect their citizens.
I do not engage in trading, brokering or ‘arms dealing’ activities. Comparing me with the other two individuals in the article reveals an alarming lack of understanding of the industry.
Thirdly, I operate in a highly regulated and controlled sector in which I scrupulously respect the applicable rules and regulations. I have never been charged or implicated in any criminal proceedings whatsoever.
Fourthly, it is public knowledge that I am a supporter of the African National Congress (ANC). I have never made any secrets of my support for the ANC.
Neither I nor the Paramount Group has benefited from my support of the ANC.
Indeed, Paramount Group has never been awarded any substantial defence contract in South Africa.
Moreover, I should point out that I am not the first businessman to financially support the ANC. Many other business leaders have supported the ANC to a much greater extend than me. However, I chose to state my support publicly in the interest of transparency.
Fifthly, I have never used the funds of “new contracts” to fill in the ‘gaps” on previous contracts that were not honoured.
These are false rumours that were probably circulated in order to prevent companies in the Paramount Group from competing fairly in a tender.
Lastly, contrary to what is stated in the article, I was never mentioned in the “Panama Papers” and I have never been implicated in any way whatsoever.
Furthermore, while I was informed that Barclays Bank had reported a few ‘suspicious banking transactions’, the Bank never blocked any of these transactions despite having the full power to do so. This confirms that Barclays Bank’s suspicions, which they never approached me about, turned out to be unfounded. For the record, a suspicious activity report is not evidence of any wrongdoing or criminality. Neither Paramount Group or I have ever been subject to an investigation or prosecution by any worldwide enforcement agency.
Right of reply: Paramount Group Limited, parent company of the Paramount Group, represented by its Vice-President Mr Clifford Dewell.
This article calls for the following observations on behalf of Paramount Group Limited:
First of all, it is very disappointing that the journalist didn’t approach a single representative of the companies of the Paramount Group for comments or to request an interview before the publication of this article, which would have avoided the publication of false information.
Secondly, the companies in the Paramount Group manufacture, build and supply military, maritime and aerospace defence equipment and technologies for sovereign governments around the world.
Indeed, these companies operate ten manufacturing and innovation facilities on the African, American and Asian continent, including South Africa, the United States of America and Kazakhstan.
These companies employ a significant number of employees worldwide, many of whom are in highly skilled engineering and design positions.
These companies design and manufacture in particular:
- a wide range of naval ships;
- armoured vehicles;
- Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs);
- reconnaissance and multi-mission patrol aircraft
- and upgrade and modernise supersonic aircraft
They also have facilities to upgrade and modernise rotary and fixed wing aircraft and supply optronic solutions.
The companies of the Paramount Group are therefor engaged in large-scale industrial activities marked by a high degree of innovation and manufacturing. We are not in the business of trading or brokering arms.
These companies were created for the purpose of supporting legitimate sovereign governments to defend their countries, protect territorial sovereignty and maintain stability in order to provide for the needs of their citizens.
Furthermore, the Paramount Group of companies operate in a highly regulated and supervised sector in which they scrupulously respect the relevant rules and regulations, as evidenced by the fact that they have operations in numerous countries including the United States of America.
It should be noted that South Africa has one of the strictest arms control systems in the world and that its National Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCAAC) regulates and monitors all exports of equipment from the companies of the Paramount Group from South Africa to sovereign countries around the world.
This Committee (NCACC) has never criticised any transaction executed by companies in the Paramount Group.
Thirdly, the companies of the Paramount Group have not benefited from the support given by their founder, Mr Ivor Ichikowitz, to the African National Congress (ANC), a political party of which he has been a member for many years.
Indeed these companies have never been allocated any substantial defence contract in South Africa. The only contracts with the South African government are a few equipment maintenance contracts that were inherited following the acquisition of local equipment manufacturing companies.
Fourthly, Paramount companies have never used “new contracts” to fill in the “gaps” of previous ones that were not honoured.
These are false rumours that were probably circulated in order to prevent companies in the Paramount Group from competing fairly in a tender.
Moreover, contrary to what is indicated in the article, the contract signed with the Malawian government was not cancelled but renegotiated, as indicated in those terms, within the framework of an official communication published in 2013: “Paramount Group’s contract with the Government of Malawi was concluded through Malawian Government processes and was signed by both the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Defence, confirming both the legality of the agreement and its legality under Malawian law”.
This was confirmed in September 2020 by former Finance Minister Goodall Gondwa who stated, in an interview with the Malawian newspaper “The Nation”, that “the Attorney General advised that we should continue with the contract.” and “Negotiations happened but we only renegotiated the period of payment and not the sum of the contract.” and “They (Paramount) delivered everything”.
In addition, the contract signed with the State of Mali has been honoured in full. The first part of the contract that was financed has been executed and all the equipment delivered.
Finally, with regard to the contract signed with the State of Togo, the delays in deliveries are due to contractual amedments requested by the Government. These are now been finalised and deliveries are now taking place on a continuous basis.
Fifthly, we were unfortunately forced to liquidate the company, Paramount Combat Systems, due to financial difficulties as a result of poor economic conditions in the local market and the failure of a customer to pay for a large armoured vehicle order that had been delivered.
However, all the companies in the Paramount Group have made significant efforts to limit job losses for employees of Paramount Combat Systems and offered them re-employment opportunities across its other businesses.
These companies have also invested heavily in research and development to prevent such a situation from happening again.
Sixthly and lastly, none of the companies in the Paramount Group have been implicated in criminal proceedings in connection with the “Panama Papers”.
Furthermore, if Barclays believed any transaction was suspicious it was entitled to block it and their compliance team would have done so. As a matter of record, the fact of a suspicious activity report is not evidence of wrongdoing or criminality. Neither Mr Ichikowitz nor any Paramount company has ever been subject to an investigation or prosecution by any worldwide enforcement agency. The rumours that may have circulated on this issue are inaccurate.
Understand Africa's tomorrow... today
We believe that Africa is poorly represented, and badly under-estimated. Beyond the vast opportunity manifest in African markets, we highlight people who make a difference; leaders turning the tide, youth driving change, and an indefatigable business community. That is what we believe will change the continent, and that is what we report on. With hard-hitting investigations, innovative analysis and deep dives into countries and sectors, The Africa Report delivers the insight you need.View subscription options