Ethiopia's decision to postpone its August 2020 elections indefinitely has raised political temperatures in the country, as both the government and opposition parties accuse each other of attempting a power grab.
Coronavirus: U.S. vs. China in the battle of perceptions
Providing global “public goods” in health, security and other areas has long been a responsibility taken on by the United States. Now, though, as the United States struggles to contain the COVID-19 outbreak at home and with its “America First” foreign policy doctrine, Washington is less inclined to providing global leadership, giving China a unique opportunity to fill the void.
As conditions in China begin to improve and life slowly returns to normal in many of the impacted cities, the Chinese government is now dedicating more attention to providing material, technical and financial support for other countries, including many in Africa, in the fight to contain COVID-19.
READ MORE Top 10 coronavirus fake news items
The most visible evidence of this more prominent Chinese role is in Italy where Beijing has donated 26 tons of supplies and deployed a team of specialists to advise the government in Rome.
China is emerging as a global public goods provider as the US proves unable and unwilling to lead.
This is an important development, and if the trend continues, it’s one with potentially serious consequences for the US role in the world. https://t.co/6n5Hlm6FY8
— Rush Doshi (@RushDoshi) March 10, 2020
In Africa, where the U.S. remains the largest aid donor by far, Washington is contributing additional funds to the fight against COVID-19 with a $37 million supplemental allocation to 25 impacted African countries.
But considering that the United States spent $2.3bn in the campaign against Ebola and the fact that COVID-19 is going to impact far more countries, it shouldn’t be a huge surprise that a growing number of observers are questioning Washington’s commitment.
The U.S. government allocated approximately $2.369bn for Ebola response activities that included technical expertise, resources to the response and new emergency operations center in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
“Washington has stuck to its “America First” isolationist approach, directing all its energy to domestic measures to protect its citizens against the virus,” said Peter Kajwanga, Chief Executive of the Africa Policy Institute in a recent column in Kenya’s Daily Nation newspaper. “America has significantly rolled back its contribution to global preparedness to combat pandemics.”
Kajwanga is right in broad terms, but his argument leaves out some crucial context. While a lot of people in Africa and elsewhere have become frustrated and disillusioned with U.S. foreign policy on the continent and the Trump administration’s perceived abrasiveness, the reality is that the United States still spends far more on human development programs on the continent than any other country.
The article continues below
Get your free PDF: The 100 most influential Africans, 2019 edition
Trailblazers, leaders and titans
Complete the form for your free download of The Africa Report’s 2019 list of the 100 most influential Africans. Get your free PDF by completing the following form.
The fact that China is getting more attention for its recent increase in aid spending on the continent aggravates U.S. officials, who feel that the positive press coverage doesn’t acknowledge that Beijing’s contributions don’t come close to those of the United States.
COVID-19 is going to provide a critical global leadership test for the U.S. and China.
But as we evaluate which of these two countries is contributing more to the “public good,” it’ll be critical to judge them both on the optics of their efforts, as well as the substance.
This article first appeared on the China Africa Project.