Coronavirus: ‘People’s vaccine’ campaigners claim victory at WHO summit

In depth
This article is part of the dossier: Corona Chronicles: 25 May – 29 May

By Patrick Smith
Posted on Monday, 25 May 2020 13:29

tedros adhanom ghebreyesus
Tedros dahanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO, speaks at the opening of the 73rd Assembly on May 18, 2020 (@WHO)

The campaign for a vaccine against the cororonavirus to be recognised as a global public good – patent-free, produced at scale and internationally available  – is making headway. But progress is complicated by geopolitical rivalries between China and the United States as well as business interests.

Asian, African, and European states got near unanimous backing for a resolution calling for the pooling of patents and affordable access for any vaccine against the cororonavirus, after winning some critical  diplomatic and practical arguments in favour of global cooperation.

Their resolution at the  World Health Organisation’s assembly in Geneva on 18-20 May committed all member states to work collaboratively  for the development of therapeutics and vaccines for the COVID-19 response and “voluntary pooling and licensing of patents to facilitate equitable and affordable access to them”.

Theory VS Reality

On paper, this would allow cash-strapped countries to override patents to get access to new therapeutics and vaccines against the virus. Its reference to the Doha Declaration on Intellectual Property and Public Health, means the backers of this resolution could draw on the authority of the  World Trade Organisation to implement it.

Just how that might work was thrown into doubt at the Geneva summit when the United States delegation disassociated its government from those commitments. US diplomats, led by Washington’s ambassador to Geneva, Andrew Bremberg, a close ally of President Donald Trump, were trying to win support from African and other delegations for a condemnation of Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as Director General of the WHO.

READ MORE Coronavirus: Is WHO Chief Tedros Ghebreyesus on the chopping block?

They were also seeking a dilution of the resolution’s call for a ‘people’s vaccine’.

“A puppet of China”

Washington’s case wasn’t helped by President Trump’s calling the WHO a “puppet of China”. He followed that up with a threat to withdraw the US from the WHO within 30 days unless it implemented unspecified reforms.

“Trump’s use of the WHO Assembly to pursue his campaign against China played into Beijing’s hands,” said one delegate at the meeting. “The mood was that we have to work together now to tackle the pandemic … then do the analysis and the investigations later.”

Responding to Trump’s statements, China’s President Xi Jinping rejected what he called bids to politicise the WHO, then offered $2bn in fresh funding to compensate for the loss of the US contributions, which Trump suspended last month.

Xi added that China would also support the calls for a vaccine to be classed as a global public good. This is an important statement, given that China is a key competitor, along with Europe and the U.S., in the race to produce a safe and effective vaccine.

READ MORE Coronavirus: Calls for free COVID-19 vaccine ahead of WHO assembly

One of the African ambassadors in Geneva told The Africa Report that there had been no support for the US position. “They tried to organise some meetings but there was no interest in that … in the end the US officials spoke only to the Cameroonian ambassador.”

US gets no support

Bremberg and his team, despite brandishing a four-page letter from President Trump lambasting the WHO and Tedros, failed on all counts. They could not get any other member states to back them.

Under current conditions there was no guarantee that logic would prevail over political interests.

The Cameroonian Embassy, which represents the Africa group at the UN in Geneva, had put out a statement calling for universal access to the vaccine and commending Tedros’s handling of the pandemic.

In the end, the US delegates argued that the assembly’s decision on access to the vaccine would take away the profit incentive from pharmaceutical companies to develop a vaccine. They went on to argue that doing so was a “misinterpretation of international trade obligations” which would discourage companies from “new drug development and expand[ing] access to medicine.”

No place for rich country domination

This debate followed an open letter on 14 May from South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa, Senegal’s Macky Sall and Ghana’s Nana Akufo-Addo, and another 40 international public figures arguing that a vaccine was the world’s best chance of “putting a stop to this painful global pandemic.”

READ MORE Africa, the world and COVID-19: The perspective of Macky Sall, President of Senegal

This reflects a concern that just as rich countries have dominated the market for medical technology, such as ventilators and oxygen machines, even for personal protective equipment, they would marginalise poorer countries in the distribution of vaccines.

The letter says “we cannot afford for monopolies, crude competition and near-sighted nationalism to stand in the way” of universal access to a vaccine.

“New space race”

There are over 70 candidates for an effective vaccine in research currently. Some liken the rivalry to a new space race.

The prize would be the national kudos of having got there first. But many public health experts are sceptical that producing the vaccine will be a unilateral project. “The Ebola vaccine was ‘discovered’ in Canada, tested in the United States and then manufactured in Germany,” said one of the industry delegates in Geneva.

Before any proposed vaccine gets international acceptance, there will  have to be extensive clinical trials. Regulators will have to approve each stage in the development and manufacturing of the vaccine.

Getting a vaccine past stringent international safety and quality controls will test the resources  of the biggest pharmaceutical conglomerates, even in the middle of  a global health emergency.

That could give the WHO a gatekeeping role in managing the production and distribution of the vaccine. It also fits in with the aims of other international partnerships to raise money for vaccine development – the Access to COVID-19 tools (ACT) Accelerator and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Initiatives.

“Vaccine nationalism”

Last month, the European Commission raised €7.4bn for the development and distribution of vaccines against coronavirus, saying it was committed to make it available to the poorest countries.

But representatives from some of the biggest pharmaceutical-producing countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, India, Russia and the United States weren’t there and have shown no interest in backing the initiative. That raises the spectre of vaccine nationalism.

Perhaps the organisation best placed to fight that is the WHO itself but if the US quits and ploughs ahead unilaterally, it will weaken both the organisation and prospects for global health cooperation, say officials in Geneva.

“In the end, I think the US will probably cut a deal and stay in the WHO,” said a diplomat in Geneva. “If you look at all the US officials working at [the] WHO headquarters and its collaboration with the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, it’s in the interests of global health security.” But, he added, that under current conditions there was no guarantee that logic would prevail over political interests.

Understand Africa's tomorrow... today

We believe that Africa is poorly represented, and badly under-estimated. Beyond the vast opportunity manifest in African markets, we highlight people who make a difference; leaders turning the tide, youth driving change, and an indefatigable business community. That is what we believe will change the continent, and that is what we report on. With hard-hitting investigations, innovative analysis and deep dives into countries and sectors, The Africa Report delivers the insight you need.

View subscription options
Also in this in Depth:

Coronavirus: South Africa’s unions fight for essential workers’ safety 

As South Africa prepares for level 3 lockdown, unions are working around the clock to ensure companies comply with safety standards and regulations.

Post-coronavirus: More sorrow for Africa’s new oil and gas producers

The crash in oil and gas prices, triggered by the coronavirus pandemic and the slump in economic activity, has dealt a blow to the plans and public finances of major oil- and gas-producing countries. But a group of countries in sub-Saharan Africa once designated as “prospective producers” are facing a different challenge.

Coronavirus: Namibia praised for containing the virus

The Republic of Namibia has been praised for its containment of the spread of the coronavirus. Its index case came mid-March, but for 45 days (7 April to 21 May) no new cases were recorded.

Call to graduates during coronavirus: ‘Don’t forget how you stayed connected’

As we graduate from Harvard amidst the pandemic, we reflect on the juxtaposition of our relative privilege with the systematic marginalization of the artisanal miners in the Democratic Republic of Congo. As we go into the real world, we have to recognize the contribution of their labour to our education and commit to improving their lives.

Nigeria VS Coronavirus: Gas could be saving grace over crashing oil

In the fourth story of our series on the impact of COVID-19 on Nigeria's economy, we look at why the country's neglected gas reserves need to form part of the energy reforms.

Coronavirus: Nigeria’s informal economy hit hard

Nigeria’s informal economy has grown considerably over the last decade.

Coronavirus: Reforms by Angola’s Lourenço helped mitigate effects of COVID-19

Big oil-producing countries have faced a double-hit in recent months: the sudden drop in prices of oil and the economic impact of the global pandemic. In the case of Angola, which entered both crises with an already weakened economy, how are its prospects looking? The Africa Report speaks to Sergio Pugliese, the Executive President for the African Energy Chamber (AEC), to find out.

Ghana: Debt repayments greater than health or education spending

Ghana was the first sub-Saharan African country to ease restrictions when it lifted lockdown measures on 20 April. The country’s Minister of Finance Ken Ofori-Atta argued the 21-day lockdown of Ghana’s biggest cities had become financially unbearable for most of the population, a concern that gave the government little choice but to lift the restriction.

Coronavirus: How is Egypt navigating the economic fallout?

The ravages caused by the coronavirus have equalised the playing field across the globe: not one country will come out of this untouched. But as states learn to live with this new reality, they must also create policies to minimise the economic impact this crisis will undoubtedly bring.