DON'T MISS : Talking Africa New Podcast – GERD: Sudan got a raw deal from 1959 treaty with Egypt

Transportation and development

Menelaos Agaloglou
By Menelaos Agaloglou

Menelaos Agaloglou is the Head of Geography and Economics Department in the International Division of the Greek Community School in Addis Ababa. He is a researcher of the Center of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (CEMMIS), part of the University of Peloponnese in Greece. He has taught Conflict Resolution and English in the University of Hargeisa in Somalia and Social Studies at the Ahmadiyya elementary school in Sierra Leone. He has travelled throughout western, central and eastern Africa and carried out a research for a British NGO in Sila Village, Mauritania. He completed his Bachelor degree at Queen Mary, University of London on Politics with Business. His MSc Degree on Globalization and Development was completed at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London. He speaks English, French and Greek.

Posted on Tuesday, 28 May 2013 17:44

With a third of its population living in landlocked countries, Sub Saharan Africa has one of the lowest road densities in the world. And villages that lack direct access to main roads suffer from market exclusion. They have fewer incentives to enable them produce or even trade surplus goods. Escaping poverty in such a situation becomes nearly impossible.

Insufficient infrastructure is holding the continent back. Railway density on the continent is unimpressive: 2.7 km per 1000km2 compared to Europe’s 400 km per 1000km2. And the African Development Bank reports that a shortage of roads, water and electricity reduces Sub Saharan Africa’s economic output by 40 percent.

High transit tariffs due to inadequate infrastructure leads to an escalation of export costs, and reduce their attractiveness on the global market. Imported goods are a luxury very few local consumers can afford. Poor roads, inadequate rails and ineffecient harbours continue to drive up the prices of locally produced goods.

The cost of moving Africa’s imports inland is twice as much as that of other low income countries. The 2005 commission on Africa argued that transport costs adds 80 percent on the price of Ugandan clothing.

But transport infrastructure goes beyond trade. A village in a remote region of Ethiopia, for example, may be better off with a proper all-season road than a school funded by an NGO. The reason being that, if local farmers can transport their products to the market, they would be able to afford to put their wards in schools that work.

So how are African governments and the aid community utilising the scarce amount of capital they possess? In spite of the western rhetoric of a new colonial power in Africa, the input of low-cost Chinese companies has proven that roads, ports and railways can be afforded even by poor countries. Countries like Ethiopia have, in recent years, found it easier to contract Chinese companies for big infrastructure projects including new road networks, urban railway projects, dams and river crossings.

Correcting a wrong

The African Development Bank believes that Africa can become a middle income continent within a decade if it spends $90bn a year on infrastructure. It is only 5 percent of its GDP but double the current spending level on this sector. Although the resources exist, there is a lack of political will.

Amid arguments that local politicians spend their scarce budget funding on prestigious projects in the capital cities or by staffing the public sector with supporters, experts have indicated that conditions imposed by the World Bank and the IMF have also contributed in low state investment in the infrastructure sector. The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTD) has also reported that African investment in transport infrastructure has been squeezed in the past 20 years as a result of sharp cuts in public spending under structural adjustment programmes.

Africa’s poor history of international co-operation in road construction cannot be separated from colonial powers, competing superpowers and regional powers who have failed to encourage road links between their respective spheres of influence. This is a wrong regional blocs can correct, by filling in the gap, coordinating plans and actions for development projects as their influence grows. One such projects is the development of the Trans-African Highway network to link the continent’s countries and regions, both vertically and horizontally, to promote intra-state trade and facilitate low cost transportation for African exports.

In recent years, West African countries especially have begun exploiting more and more minerals such as iron, ore, manganese and coal to meet growing demands. But inadequate railway networks have acted as a brake on the booming commodities sector.

Despite the dire need of a rail network in Africa, railway infrastructure is at a crossroads, with private companies failing to invest in the sector. Governments are therefore left with the burden of funding both infrastructure development and improvement in a sector that remains vital to the continent and thus should be viewed as a necessary investment opportunity.

Improved transportation is certain to ensure the continent’s economic integration. A developed transport sector will not only drive African economies but also improve education, health care and technology. A great example is East Asia, which experienced an economic boom as a result of state policies that supported development by virtue of improvements in the transport sector, the active support of local industry and efforts to improve both skilled and non-skilled labour.

We value your privacy

The Africa Report uses cookies to provide you with a quality user experience, measure audience, and provide you with personalized advertising. By continuing on The Africa Report, you agree to the use of cookies under the terms of our privacy policy.
You can change your preferences at any time.