The argument by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that tightening South Africa’s wealth tax regime would rebalance ... generational inequality has a fundamental flaw: it targets a “flighty” base, says an expert from the African Tax Institute.
The African Development Bank (AfDB) is engaged in a race against “downgrading”. According to our information, the institution chaired by Nigerian Akinwumi Adesina is seriously considering authorising a special capital increase, an exceptional measure to protect its AAA rating.
Approved by the bank’s board of directors at the end of January, the procedure will be examined by the board of governors at a meeting scheduled for 5 March before, if necessary, being implemented from mid-March onwards.
Continuation under threat
For the AfDB, maintaining its AAA rating – awarded by Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s and Japan’s JCR – is crucial. This rating, which is extremely rare on the continent, means that it has a good deficit and has access to the international financial markets.
It allows AfDB to raise significant amounts of funds even in times of crisis, to access a wide variety of investors and to conduct hedging operations, which guarantees that it can lend to its members over the long term and at advantageous rates. In other words, the AAA rating contributes to the bank’s efficiency and its operations on the continent.
However, the Covid-19 crisis and its consequences for AfDB shareholders threaten it. To maintain this rating, Fitch requires the pan-African bank to present sufficient “callable” capital – i.e. resources that can be mobilised in case of emergency from countries that hold this AAA rating, i.e. from the AfDB’s non-regional shareholders.
Hard hits from North America
However, the amount of “callable” capital going to countries with a good rating continues to decline. The first major blow came in June 2020 when Fitch downgraded Canada’s rating from AAA to AA+, a major AAA shareholder up to that point.
In its latest available report on the AfDB, published on 21 July, Fitch pointed out that one of the “key assumptions” made to explain the bank’s unchanged rating was that no other “AAA-rated member state will be downgraded in the medium term.” Ten days later, the same agency downgraded the outlook on the bank’s largest AAA shareholder, the US, from “stable” to “negative”, raising concerns about a future lowering of the country’s rating. S&P had already lowered the country’s rating in 2011 from AAA to AA+, a level that has since remained unchanged according to S&P’s assessment.
The article continues below
Get your free PDF: Top 200 banks 2019
The race to transform
Complete the form and download, for free, the highlights from The Africa Report’s Exclusive Ranking of Africa’s top 200 banks from last year. Get your free PDF by completing the following form
For the AfDB, the consequences are far-reaching. According to the bank’s data, Canada’s downgrade resulted in a 25% reduction in lending targets for 2020-2030, from 6.5 billion Units of Account (UA) per year (about €7.6bn) to an average of 5 billion (about €5.9bn).
A possible downgrading of the US rating could lead to an even more drastic reduction in lending activity, which would then fall to an average of UA 3.2 billion per year (around €3.7bn). This could call into question the legitimacy of the institution and even expose it to legal recourse by borrowers for non-disbursement.
The AfDB is acting fast to avoid this disastrous scenario. Its board of directors is proposing a temporary increase in “callable” capital reserved for AAA-rated countries to prevent this catastrophe. The AfDB went from employing 27.2% of total callable capital in 2010 to 16.6% in June 2020. This percentage would fall to 10.2% if the US’ rating fell.
Four of the AfDB’s “AAA” rated shareholders are expected to participate in this exceptional “callable” capital increase. They are Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Luxembourg. It would only take effect in the event of a downgrade of the US’ rating and would avoid, by a harmful ripple effect, the lowering of the AfDB’s rating.
The capital increase in question would give rise to the granting of voting rights (on the basis of one vote for every five shares) without upsetting the bank’s shareholder base. By statute, the ratio must be maintained at 60% voting rights for regional (African) members and 40% for non-regional members.
In addition to this endeavour to maintain the triple-A, the AfDB continues its efforts to conduct the general capital increase, approved on 31 October 2019 and aimed at doubling the institution’s authorised capital (from $93 to $208bn). This serves as further proof of the “extraordinary support” demonstrated by the bank’s shareholders, which the rating agencies have taken into account.
Understand Africa's tomorrow... today
We believe that Africa is poorly represented, and badly under-estimated. Beyond the vast opportunity manifest in African markets, we highlight people who make a difference; leaders turning the tide, youth driving change, and an indefatigable business community. That is what we believe will change the continent, and that is what we report on. With hard-hitting investigations, innovative analysis and deep dives into countries and sectors, The Africa Report delivers the insight you need.View subscription options